Business & Management📄 Essay📅 2026
Share:

How Students Use This Paper

  • Research reference: Use as a model for structuring your own essay
  • Citation examples: See how to properly cite sources in Business & Management
  • Topic understanding: Grasp complex concepts through clear explanations
  • Argument structure: Learn how to build compelling academic arguments

Academic Integrity Notice: This paper is provided for research and reference purposes only. Use it to inform your own work, but do not submit it as your own. Plagiarism violates academic honor codes.

Format:

Running head: BALANCING MAKING AND BUYING IN TALENT MANAGEMENT:

Balancing Making and Buying in Talent Management: Optimizing Staffing Outcomes

Phoebessays

February 12, 2026

Abstract

According to utility theory, decision-makers aim to maximize their outcomes by weighing the costs and advantages of various options. Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of "making" (using existing applicant pools) and "buying" (spending in recruitment efforts) techniques in the context of talent management and staffing: Advantages Cost: Using existing applicant pools is often less expensive because it requires little or no external advertising or recruitment. Staffing Outcomes: Because of internal promotions or transfers, "making" can lead to increased employee morale and loyalty. Employees who are already familiar with the organization's culture may need less time to adjust and may be more productive. Limitation: The candidate pool may be lacking in diversity, and skill gaps may occur if internal candidates lack the necessary qualifications or experience for particular positions. Disadvantages Cost: Recruitment activities can be costly, with fees incurred for advertising, screening, interviewing, and onboarding new employees. Staffing Results: "Buying" can bring in new viewpoints and various skill sets, so improving the talent pool. New personnel may provide fresh perspectives and help the organization thrive. Risk: External candidates may take longer to assimilate into the culture of the firm, and there is a chance of higher turnover if the fit is not optimal. Improving Staffing Outcomes: A mixture of these tactics can be employed to improve staffing outcomes. Organizations can use their existing applicant pools to fill vacancies that match internal individuals' talents and career goals. Investing in recruitment efforts at the same time can assist attract external talent to cover skill gaps and provide new views. Real-World Application: When candidates browse recruiting platforms like Monster.com and LinkedIn, firms try to entice them by highlighting their unique selling points: Competitive Compensation: To recruit potential employees, highlight attractive compensation and benefit packages. Career advancement and promotion: Emphasizing possibilities for professional...

BALANCING MAKING AND 1
💡

APA 7th Edition— Title centered and bold, double-spaced throughout, 1" margins, Times New Roman 12pt. First line of each paragraph indented 0.5". Running head on first page only.

🔒

This one's locked rn.

Unlock it for $1.99 or go Pro and never hit a wall again. Your call.

Unlock this resource

One-time purchase, instant access

$1.99

Buy on Gumroad — $1.99
or

USDC on Base or Solana

or
Go Pro — $9/mo for unlimited access →

Cancel whenever. Instant access to everything.

Want unlimited access?

Unlock our full reference library — thousands of academic examples across every discipline.

Go Pro →

Cite this Essay

Phoebessays. (2026, February 12). Balancing Making and Buying in Talent Management: Optimizing Staffing Outcomes. Retrieved from https://phoebessays.com/paper/talent-management-balancing-make-vs-buy-approach-phoebessays-62787dcf-0bd9-4918-ba04-e7daaaf518eb

By citing this paper, you ensure academic integrity and help others find quality research.

Related Papers