How Students Use This Paper
- ✓Research reference: Use as a model for structuring your own essay
- ✓Citation examples: See how to properly cite sources in Law & Criminal Justice
- ✓Topic understanding: Grasp complex concepts through clear explanations
- ✓Argument structure: Learn how to build compelling academic arguments
Academic Integrity Notice: This paper is provided for research and reference purposes only. Use it to inform your own work, but do not submit it as your own. Plagiarism violates academic honor codes.
Running head: UNRELIABLE RECOVERED MEMORIES: WHY THEY SHOULD NOT
Unreliable Recovered Memories: Why They Should Not Be Used as Evidence in Court
Phoebessays
February 12, 2026
Abstract
Recovered Memories Are Not Reliable or a Credible Source of Evidence in Court [Name] [University] Outline: Background Adults who claim to remember they had been sexually abused as a child is what came to be known as recovered memories Psychotherapists explain that memories of child abuse get repressed and later get recovered Thesis Statement: Problems with the memory, creation of false memories during intervention, and lack of evidence to back their usefulness makes recovered memories unreliable and should not be presented as a credible source of evidence in court. Problems with memory Repressed memories have become more known as dissociative amnesia (Otgaar, et al., 2019) The therapists have argued that repressed memories could be recovered in adulthood and accurately provide evidence in assault cases It is more probable that repressed memories come from suggestive influences and procedures to create false memories of abuse (Davis & Loftus, 2014). Data suggests that certain aspects of trauma are remembered easily rather than forgotten or pushed away from the conscious mind (Otgaar, et al., 2019) False memories may be created during the care of victims and therapeutic intervention Potentially harmful therapy practices have led to high percentages of adults remembering alleged repressed and recovered memories of abuse (Patihis & Pendergrast, 2018). During the intervention process, details of the abuse and the relationship between the victim and perpetrator change in a child’s memory Therapists who discuss the possibility of repressed abuse are more likely to have patients that remember abuse than those that do not. (Patihis & Pendergrast, 2018). Relying on such information for criminal procedures is misleading and has the potential to affect the evidence brought before the court (Patihis & Pendergrast, 2018). Recovered memories affect credibility of the evidence it provides There is need to ensure that the information use to prosecute perpetrators of abuse is...
APA 7th Edition— Title centered and bold, double-spaced throughout, 1" margins, Times New Roman 12pt. First line of each paragraph indented 0.5". Running head on first page only.
This one's locked rn.
Unlock it for $1.99 or go Pro and never hit a wall again. Your call.
Unlock this resource
One-time purchase, instant access
$1.99
Buy on Gumroad — $1.99USDC on Base or Solana
Cancel whenever. Instant access to everything.
Want unlimited access?
Unlock our full reference library — thousands of academic examples across every discipline.
Go Pro →Cite this Essay
By citing this paper, you ensure academic integrity and help others find quality research.