How Students Use This Paper
- ✓Research reference: Use as a model for structuring your own essay
- ✓Citation examples: See how to properly cite sources in Economics & Finance
- ✓Topic understanding: Grasp complex concepts through clear explanations
- ✓Argument structure: Learn how to build compelling academic arguments
Academic Integrity Notice: This paper is provided for research and reference purposes only. Use it to inform your own work, but do not submit it as your own. Plagiarism violates academic honor codes.
Running head: ANALYZING DEBT-EQUITY RATIOS OF APPLE AND GOOGLE:
Analyzing Debt-Equity Ratios of Apple and Google: A Financial Comparison
Phoebessays
February 12, 2026
Abstract
QUESTION 11 Debt to Equity Ratio = TOTAL LIABILITIES / STAKEHOLDERS EQUITY APPLE Current year = 120292 / 111547 = 1.0784 solution 107.84% Prior year = 83451/123549 = 0.6754 solution 67.54% GOOGLE CURRENT = 26633/104500 = 0.2549 SOLUTION 25.49% PRIOR = 23611/87309 = 0.27043 SOLUTION 27.04% Apple’s debt-equity ratio is 0.6754 and 1.0784 which is higher than the average of 0.44 debt-equity ratio. Therefore, the debt-equity ratio for the current and the prior year are very risky to use. Google’s debt ratio is 0.25 and 0.25. Therefore the two debt-equity ratios are friendly to use since they are less than 0.44. However, to completely minimize the risk, we choose a debt-equity ratio of 0.25 since it is the least.
APA 7th Edition— Title centered and bold, double-spaced throughout, 1" margins, Times New Roman 12pt. First line of each paragraph indented 0.5". Running head on first page only.
This one's locked rn.
Unlock it for $1.99 or go Pro and never hit a wall again. Your call.
Unlock this resource
One-time purchase, instant access
$1.99
Buy on Gumroad — $1.99USDC on Base or Solana
Cancel whenever. Instant access to everything.
Want unlimited access?
Unlock our full reference library — thousands of academic examples across every discipline.
Go Pro →Cite this Essay
By citing this paper, you ensure academic integrity and help others find quality research.